Hydroelectric dams are becoming unpopular, unprofitable, less significant, and are new dams are more likely to be cancelled. New solar and wind energy systems now exceed new hydroelectric systems.
“Last year, according to the United Nations Environment Program, newly opened hydropower projects supplied 22,000 megawatts of generating capacity. In contrast, international developers opened 118,000 megawatts of wind and solar generating capacity.” – Circle of Blue
For decades, hydroelectricity was one of the cleanest energy sources. The technology was inherently simple, dams could also supply water for people and agriculture, and the likelihood of catastrophic failure was dramatically smaller than nuclear. Now that the prices of solar and wind energy systems have dropped, the negatives of dams are becoming more apparent. Dams require square miles of territory, take years to build, are very centralized, disrupt the environment upstream and downstream, and also tend to go 70% over budget, on average. The decentralization of solar and wind, the ease of construction and operation, the lower (but not zero) environmental impact, and the ease of managing the sites now mean big power projects are losing to the new technologies. One recently discovered and unexpected dam impact is that the basins tend to emit methane, a particularly powerful greenhouse gas. One more reason to delay or switch.
(Click on the photo for the link.)

“Popularity Of Big Hydropower Projects Diminishes Around The World” – Circle of Blue
Pingback: Data That Matters July 2016 | Pretending Not To Panic